European eel
Published November 2010, revised December 2010.
ICES reiterates its previous advice that all anthropogenic mortality (e.g. recreational and commercial fishing, barriers to passage, habitat alteration, pollution, etc.) affecting production and escapement of eels should be reduced to as close to zero as possible until there is clear evidence that the stock is increasing. A concerted effort by all European countries to conserve eel habitats is urgently needed.
Given the current record-low abundance of glass eels, ICES reiterates its concern that glass eel stocking programs are unlikely to contribute to the recovery of the European eel stock. This is because (a) there is no surplus anywhere of glass eel to be redistributed to other areas and (b) there is evidence that stocked/translocated eels experience impairment of their navigational abilities
History
Published under the auspices of the following ICES Steering Group or Committee
- ACOM
Period covered by advice
2011Series
ICES Advice: Recurrent adviceNew edition of
Usage metrics
Categories
- Fisheries and aquaculture
- Arctic Ocean (ICES Ecoregion)
- Azores (ICES Ecoregion)
- Baltic Sea (ICES Ecoregion)
- Bay of Biscay and the Iberian Coast (ICES Ecoregion)
- Barents Sea (ICES Ecoregion)
- Celtic Seas (ICES Ecoregion)
- Faroes (ICES Ecoregion)
- Greater North Sea (ICES Ecoregion)
- Greenland Sea (ICES Ecoregion)
- Icelandic Waters (ICES Ecoregion)
- Norwegian Sea (ICES Ecoregion)
- Oceanic Northeast Atlantic (ICES Ecoregion)
- All ICES Ecoregions